forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From d...@multitask.com.au
Subject Re: Stylebook transition
Date Tue, 09 Jul 2002 07:33:02 GMT
Was there a reason? Since XHTML is designed to be reused this way.......? 
Or is it that noone knew much about modularisation?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Work:      http://www.multitask.com.au
Developers: http://adslgateway.multitask.com.au/developers


Steven Noels <stevenn@outerthought.org> wrote on 07/09/2002 05:02:38 PM:

> dion@multitask.com.au wrote:
> 
> > On the DTD front, is it using a modularised XHTML DTD driver, or is it 
a 
> > copy/paste of the required HTML elements/attributes?
> 
> nope, it doesn't technically borrow from the XHTML modules, it just 
> reuses some of the naming and semantical conventions
> 
> from an instance perspective, the xdocs v11 are quite similar/almost 
> identical to the older v10 docs (Stylebook), except for much stronger 
> validation.
> 
> </Steven>
> -- 
> Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
> Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
> stevenn@outerthought.org                      stevenn@apache.org
> 

Mime
View raw message