Bert Van Kets wrote:
> At 17:54 23/07/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>
>> Bert Van Kets wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using Forrest to generate a small site. It's a good test for the
>>> whole concept.
>>> The biggest problem I'm having is with the document2html.xsl,
>>> specially the table tag.
>>> The table attributes are fixed in the tag!! Therefor I would like to
>>> propose the following:
>>> Leave every (most) regular xhtml tag alone and create our own tags
>>> for the specific cases. We have done so for most cases (link, fork,
>>> title, ...).
>>> This will alow the users a lot more flexibility when they want to use
>>> their own layout without having to rewrite the document xsl.
>>> I had to delete the table tag all together.
>>
>>
>> How the heck are you going to validate this?
>> I'm against anything that is not predefined.
>> There is no need to keep loose; please post an explicit example so
>> that we can evaluate it.
>
>
> ATM there is no validation of the xdocs files AFAK.
Which we *will* fix ;-)
> Here's a snip of
> the table template in document2html.xsl
> <xsl:template match="table">
> <table class="table" cellpadding="4" cellspacing="1">
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </table>
> No background color, no cellpadding or cellspacing alternatives :(
Which effectively don't belong there.
They are not part of the content.
> If you want true control you have to get the validation running and
> remove the <xsl:template match="node()|@*" priority="-1">.
+1
> Shoot me
> if I'm wrong. Don't take too big a gun ;-)
Naaa :-PPP
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|