forrest-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Steven Noels <stev...@outerthought.org>
Subject Re: Stylebook transition
Date Tue, 09 Jul 2002 07:30:37 GMT
dion@multitask.com.au wrote:

> Was there a reason? Since XHTML is designed to be reused this 
> way.......? Or is it that noone knew much about modularisation?

no - can you learn us? ;-)

seriously: we wanted our DTDs to be simple and only slightly differing 
from the older xdoc DTDs - the only serious other option was DocBook 
which was considered to be too compex for simple project website editing 
needs

given the state of formal XML grammars in other similar projects, I 
think we went as far as possible without scaring people off with 
unnecessary complexity - given the fact that we are actually considering 
_validation_ as part of the publishing pipeline

AAMOF, there is quite some modularization used already if you look 
closely, but no official XHTML modules

I'm not saying we won't adopt XHTML fragments at some point in the 
future, e.g. for Forms and the like; it just wouldn't make much sense 
going for full XHTML right now

HTH,

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
stevenn@outerthought.org                      stevenn@apache.org


Mime
View raw message