Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 22196 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2002 13:46:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO beke2000.apache.org) (212.71.5.22) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jun 2002 13:46:58 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020608154854.0383cb08@wheresmymailserver.com> X-Sender: X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2002 15:48:59 +0200 To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org From: Bert Van Kets Subject: Re: [vote] focusing on internals Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N At 16:41 7/06/2002 +0200, you wrote: >This vote is about something that I think we are doing wrong: we are >skinning too soon. > >Ok, we all love Cocoon, XSLT and the ability to change the entire look >of a site by simply setting a new variable someplace. But is this a good >thing to do at this very moment? > >Looking in the forrest CVS we have: > > - avalon-site > - basic > - bert > - forrest-site > - jakarta-site > - xml-apache-site > >Now tell me: if I make a structural change in the forrest sitemap, am I >supposed to go into every skin and update it as well? > >forget it. +1 >I propose a vote to remove *all* skins from forrest but one until we >consider Forrest stable enough to make a release *and* state to skin >authors that the forrest internals are solid enough to create a skin >upon. +1 >For now, we simply can't guarantee that and I don't want any job in the >forrest internals to be slowed down by the fact that all skins must >proceed in parallel. This is just as bad as early optimization. It's >simply not the right way to do things. > >I'm not against people using Forrest with their own skins (I'm thinking >about Avalon and POI who happen to live in a forrest-agnostic land), but >I'm concerned about the fact that more skins at this point mean less >speed for forrest in general and I don't like this. > >I don't care which skin is kept in CVS and becomes the reference >implementation, but I want just one. > >Vote? This has nothing to do with my work, but I think the bert skin is the most advanced and the cleanest. Do we rename it to Forrest skin when this vote is accepterd? Bert >-- >Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be > able to give birth to a dancing star. > Friedrich Nietzsche >--------------------------------------------------------------------