Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 232 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2002 08:45:02 -0000 Received: from ptolemy.goulburn.net.au (203.28.11.5) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 5 Jun 2002 08:45:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 29696 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2002 08:45:13 -0000 Received: from max-01-012.goulburn.net.au (203.28.11.148) by ptolemy.goulburn.net.au with SMTP; 5 Jun 2002 08:45:13 -0000 Subject: Re: [vote] on titles being elements or attributes From: David Crossley To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-4) Date: 05 Jun 2002 18:45:10 +1000 Message-Id: <1023266712.2583.16248.camel@ighp> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Steven Noels wrote: > Let's get over with this... > > Should titles be child elements of sections, or remain attributes with > the section element within the v11 DTD's? > > [ ]
...
> [ ]
Forrest R&D...
> [ ] abstain > > Your votes, please. [+1]
Forrest R&D...
Everytime this issue comes up, then i go and read bits at http://xml.coverpages.org/elementsAndAttrs.html The element should have a limited content model e.g. just <code>, <em>, etc. We certainly do not want to see <link> and <br> etc. --David