Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 7302 invoked from network); 26 May 2002 01:33:31 -0000 Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (HELO pimout1-int.prodigy.net) (207.115.63.77) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 26 May 2002 01:33:31 -0000 Received: from galina (adsl-66-136-198-7.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.198.7]) by pimout1-int.prodigy.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id g4Q1Xcq290260 for ; Sat, 25 May 2002 21:33:39 -0400 Message-ID: <00a901c20455$3ddfbec0$0c91fea9@galina> From: "Ivelin Ivanov" To: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020525213529.032a81c8@mail.visitronics.be> Subject: Re: Forrest HTML (was: draft howto dtd) Date: Sat, 25 May 2002 20:32:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N My only comment is: Can't believe you're doin all this by yourself ! It usually takes enterprise usability teams months and months to do something like that. Bert Rocks ! Ivelin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bert Van Kets" To: Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:28 PM Subject: Re: Forrest HTML (was: draft howto dtd) > At 10:48 25/05/2002 -0500, you wrote: > > >Another minor comment about the current Forrest layout. > > > >It appears that the font size of the body text is fixed. > >I usually use larger fonts setting in the browser, but it doesn't > >affect Forrest pages. > > > > > >Ivelin > > That's because the current design of Forrest is mainly based on CSS and teh > font sizes are set fixed. > I'm doing a completely new HTML coding of the page to be compatible with > older browser versions. My target is Netscape 4.08! When a site runs fine > on that one, it will run on most anything. I''m not completely done, but > it's going pretty well. I'm basing my layout on the design from > Stefano. It looks a lot better than the current one. > I'm also taking people with bad vision into account and will make text > sizable. Blind people are not forgotten either, so all images have their > alt and height and width tags. > > I will check the HTML with following browsers: > - Internet Explorer 4 (Win95) > - Internet Explorer 5.0 (Win98) > - Internet Explorer 5.5 (Win98) > - Internet Explorer 6 (Win2K) > - Netscape Navigator 4.08 (Win98) > - Netscape Communicator 4.79 (Win98) > - Netscape Communicator 4.79 (Suse Linux 7.3) > - Netscape 6.2.2 (Win2K) > - Lynx 2.4.2 (Win98 Dos prompt) > - Lynx 2.8.3 (Win2K Dos prompt) > - Opera 5.02 (Win98) > - Opera 6.02 (Win2K) > > I think I've got enough with these. Does anybody need tests with other? > > My main criteria are: > - Navigation must be possible in all versions > - Style must be as similar as possible to the graphical design in all browsers > - The page must give the impression of fast loading. (NOT putting > everything in 1 table is a must for this one) > - page must be browsable and look "OK" with graphics off > - code must comply to W3C standards > - Visitor must not be forced upon a certain text size or screen size (I > hate "best viewed with" messages) Specially the text resizing is not easy > if you want to maintain an look. > > All this will be poured in a forrest skin. Long live this technology! > > I'm doing my best to get the code ready ASAP. > > Any comments or additions? > > Bert >