Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org Received: (qmail 34929 invoked from network); 23 May 2002 07:32:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO aisa?2nd.aisa) (194.184.10.212) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 23 May 2002 07:32:01 -0000 Received: from PC103 ([192.4.0.103]) by aisa_2nd.aisa (Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.6 (890.1 7-16-1999)) with SMTP id C1256BC2.002AB6AC; Thu, 23 May 2002 09:46:32 +0200 Message-ID: <003101c2022b$78cb3db0$670004c0@PC103> Reply-To: "Nicola Ken Barozzi" From: "Nicola Ken Barozzi" To: References: Subject: Re: [vote] image location Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 09:28:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N From: "Steven Noels" > We have been discussing the location of project-related images and it > seems there are various opinions + some nuisances inside the current > Cocoon 'crawler'... > > There are currently 2 options IMHO: > > * a project-specific image directory > preferably located at src/documentation/content/images > matched by the following pattern images/**.{gif|jpg|png} > read from content/xdocs/images/{1}.{gif|jpg|png} > + a special matcher for skin-specific images > > * leave the choice to the user > located at src/documentation/content... (anywhere) > matched using **.{gif|jpg|png} > read from content/{1}.ext > + have that special matcher setup for skin-specific images > (as it is now the case) > > Rationale (and my opinion): > > We don't want to put too much constraints on the projects willing to > adopt Forrest, I guess, so I'd say we leave that choice to the user - if > he decides to have a central image directory in > src/documentation/content/images, OK, if he doesn't, fine by me. So my > preference would be option 2, unless Nicola says this will cause > Ant-related problems (dunnow). > > Your votes + opinions please: > > [ ] have a fixed project-specific image directory defined in the > sitemap [+1 ] the location of project-specific images is a user-option I like it, since in many cases it can create a transition path: 1. user puts it next to the docs 2. user or another user needs to use it in another document 3. they move it to the central repository :-D > Of course, this doesn't solve the issue Nicola mentioned, we need to > further investigate that. -- Nicola Ken Barozzi nicolaken@apache.org - verba volant, scripta manent - (discussions get forgotten, just code remains) ---------------------------------------------------------------------