Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Message-ID: <092C4B8A9B51D411829E00D0B749AFBBA83199@post.flagship.ru>
From: "Piroumian, Konstantin" <KPiroumian@flagship.ru>
To: "'forrest-dev@xml.apache.org'" <forrest-dev@xml.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [LAYOUT] page.html created
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:44:26 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="koi8-r"

> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:nicolaken@apache.org] 
> From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <stefano@apache.org>
> 
> > No, please, let's KISS: when the user clicks on a link, it goes to 
> > that page and the first next tree is opened.
> >
> > This doesn't require *any* dynamism and, IMO, greates 
> smaller pages, 
> > easier to port them around and much better cognitive experience.
> >
> > This is, in fact, an example where DHTML creates more harm 
> than good 
> > (nothing against your solution, Konstantin, just my personal 
> > impressions.
> >
> > What do others think?
> 
> I would like to have this dynamism only for the next page 
> level, which IMHO takes the best of both worlds, but I'm 
> basically for less dependency on dynamism. 

So, how can it look like: dynamism for the next page? Could you please
elaborate on this a little?

>Since the site 
> *must* be usable by non dynamic browsers too, making the tree 
> complete would also make it unusable. If well done, it should 
> degrade gracefully without needing any dynamic file serving.

We can have 2 versions: dymanic and simple and serve them on either on user
request or his user-agent.

Konstantin	

> 
> --
> Nicola Ken Barozzi                   nicolaken@apache.org
>             - verba volant, scripta manent -
>    (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
>