Return-Path: <crossley@indexgeo.com.au>
Mailing-List: contact forrest-dev-help@xml.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Received: (qmail 15544 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2002 14:23:26 -0000
Received: from ptolemy.goulburn.net.au (203.28.11.5)
  by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Feb 2002 14:23:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 18615 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2002 14:23:26 -0000
Received: from max-02-034.goulburn.net.au (HELO igacer) (203.28.11.230)
  by ptolemy.goulburn.net.au with SMTP; 21 Feb 2002 14:23:26 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: David Crossley <crossley@indexgeo.com.au>
Reply-To: crossley@indexgeo.com.au
To: forrest-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Graph data
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 01:19:21 +1100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <OKEDLKGMIPDOCJHOEDEFCEMPCPAA.stevenn@outerthought.org>
In-Reply-To: <OKEDLKGMIPDOCJHOEDEFCEMPCPAA.stevenn@outerthought.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0202220119210J.01977@igacer>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N

Steven Noels wrote:
> David Crossley wrote:
> 
> > One thing that i am still confused about is why the
> > final structure has <datum> elements as children of a
> > <datum> element. Surely that would confuse the next
> > stylesheet.
> >
> > <graph>
> >  <data group="Downloads">
> >   <datum total="3441" week="2001-43">
> >    <datum value="90" dir="axis" />
> > ...
> >    <datum value="64" dir="xerces-p" />
> >   </datum>
> >
> > That is one reason that i asked if you had DTD yet,
> > actually an internal subset will suffice. I think that defining
> > the structure helps to visualise both the process and the
> > requirements. Here is a start (but it does not make sense to me).
> 
> Yep, that's why I asked Sam to change 'datum' into 'entry'... in the daily
> logfiles, too. My piece of the chain preparing the final format for John's
> stylesheet is already changed to reflect this remark. Consider it done, the
> current element name is 'entry' (in my local copy - awaiting for Centipede to
> arrive).
> 
> My current output format is:
> 
> <graph>
>   <data group="Downloads">
>     <week total="3441" date="2001-43">
>       <entry downloads="90" project="axis"/>
>       <entry downloads="91" project="batik"/>
>       <entry downloads="39" project="cocoon"/>
>       <entry downloads="46" project="cocoon2"/>
>       <entry downloads="145" project="crimson"/>
>       <entry downloads="313" project="fop"/>
>       <entry downloads="411" project="soap"/>
>       <entry downloads="28" project="xalan-c"/>
>       <entry downloads="283" project="xalan-j"/>
>       <entry downloads="7" project="xang"/>
>       <entry downloads="449" project="xerces-c"/>
>       <entry downloads="1475" project="xerces-j"/>
>       <entry downloads="64" project="xerces-p"/>
>     </week>
> 
> John, is that allright for you?
> 
> Of course changing these names is a no-brainer, so just let me know.
> 
> </Steven>

That looks much better to me. It was the incestuous relationship
with that old "datum" element being a child and parent of itself
at the same time together, that had me intrigued.

--David