fluo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From kenneth mcfarland <kennethpmcfarl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [GitHub] keith-turner commented on a change in pull request #1035: Fluo 1000
Date Fri, 01 Jun 2018 15:46:59 GMT
It seems the older versions don't blow up like 2.12. although 4.0.1 is
actually the newest but the API was reworked and its incompatible as is.

I'm playing around and 2.9 doesn't blow up like 2.12 so I'm gonna see how
far it will go without emitting a plethora of leader errors, not very
scientific approach but maybe will reveal something when cross referenced
with the release notes.



On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 6:22 AM GitBox <git@apache.org> wrote:

> keith-turner commented on a change in pull request #1035: Fluo 1000
> URL: https://github.com/apache/fluo/pull/1035#discussion_r192393659
>
>
>
>  ##########
>  File path:
> modules/core/src/main/java/org/apache/fluo/core/oracle/OracleServer.java
>  ##########
>  @@ -196,6 +196,10 @@ public OracleServer(Environment env) throws
> Exception {
>    private void allocateTimestamp() throws Exception {
>      Stat stat = new Stat();
>
> +    while
> (curatorFramework.getState().equals(CuratorFrameworkState.LATENT)) {
>
>  Review comment:
>    This fixes a problem, but not the problem we are currently seeing.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
> To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
> URL above to go to the specific comment.
>
> For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
> users@infra.apache.org
>
>
> With regards,
> Apache Git Services
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message