fluo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>
Subject Re: Podling report
Date Tue, 02 Aug 2016 20:24:24 GMT
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looks ok at first glance. IMO, it could use some more substance as to how we
> got into this situation in the first place (IPMC/Board are not Java/Maven
> experts and likely don't know what a parent pom is -- see Justin's confusion
> over a release with no code). The fact that the parent pom is necessary to
> make a release of fluo (core) and the recipes would be good to clarify. Show
> a bit more of the big picture, where things are going.
>
> I think including a link to Christopher's plan of action would be prudent
> (to show thought put into this)
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b478645815bf7b1fee8342a21924162decc173d91c22eaf5f708a435@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E
>
> Will give more feedback as I think some more.
>


That all sounds good.  I can make those changes.

> - Josh
>
>
> Keith Turner wrote:
>>
>> I took an initial pass at the report.  If anyone wants to make further
>> edits, feel free.
>>
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Wow. Things really blew up while I was offline.
>>>
>>> I would strongly recommend summarizing what happened with the parent-pom
>>> release thread in this report.
>>>
>>>
>>> Keith Turner wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I am going to work on the podling report today.

Mime
View raw message