fluo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Billie Rinaldi <bil...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Podling report
Date Wed, 03 Aug 2016 15:36:43 GMT
Looks good to me.

On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:

> I updated the report
>
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Looks ok at first glance. IMO, it could use some more substance as to
> how we
> > got into this situation in the first place (IPMC/Board are not Java/Maven
> > experts and likely don't know what a parent pom is -- see Justin's
> confusion
> > over a release with no code). The fact that the parent pom is necessary
> to
> > make a release of fluo (core) and the recipes would be good to clarify.
> Show
> > a bit more of the big picture, where things are going.
> >
> > I think including a link to Christopher's plan of action would be prudent
> > (to show thought put into this)
> >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b478645815bf7b1fee8342a21924162decc173d91c22eaf5f708a435@%3Cdev.fluo.apache.org%3E
> >
> > Will give more feedback as I think some more.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> >
> > Keith Turner wrote:
> >>
> >> I took an initial pass at the report.  If anyone wants to make further
> >> edits, feel free.
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2016
> >>
> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Wow. Things really blew up while I was offline.
> >>>
> >>> I would strongly recommend summarizing what happened with the
> parent-pom
> >>> release thread in this report.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Keith Turner wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I am going to work on the podling report today.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message