fluo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Podling name search
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2016 04:03:31 GMT
Ok, I figured this was the case (knowing you personally), but just 
wanted to double-check I wasn't making a bad assumption.

No need to do this again later. This one time should be enough.

Christopher wrote:
> Yes. Most GitHub matches were basically part of larger words related to
> those kinds of words. The exact matches I saw were hard to say whether they
> were "the project name itself", because it was just the name of the repo...
> no context, some didn't even have code or documentation. They were barely
> more than a repo name a few lines of code, certainly not established in any
> way. ... but there were over 200 repo matches to check... and I couldn't
> really check them all. I relied on GitHub's "best match" to examine just
> the first few pages.
>   A *really* thorough check into all of the GitHub matches would be quite
> time-consuming, and I'm not sure what kinds of information I'd be looking
> for. I figured that could be done later, as necessary.
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 7:17 PM Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> You wait for Shane  (VP, Brand) :). I would expect a result in a few
>> days (maybe next week, depending on his backlog).
>> The only question I have reading it now is on the matches you did see on
>> the Github search. You cited that many of the search results were due to
>> partial word matching ("fluorine, fluorescence, fluorite, or
>> fluorocarbons"), were all of the repos of a similar scientific context
>> (not the project name itself)?
>> I don't think you need to change it, just my $0.02. Shane will ask for
>> more information if he thinks it necessary
>> Christopher wrote:
>>> I've updated the issue with a comment showing the results of my searching
>>> today. Not sure what's next.
>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 2:36 PM Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>> I've done one of these before. Feel free to ask if there is any
>> confusion.
>>>> Christopher wrote:
>>>>> I've created a JIRA, beginning the task of establishing the Fluo name's
>>>>> suitability as an Apache trademark:
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-109
>>>>> This is a task required prior to graduation, but I figured it's never
>> too
>>>>> early to start.
>>>>> Documentation about what we need to do is here:
>>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/names.html#search

View raw message