Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7EE200B41 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:05:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9D24D160A68; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:05:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E37F0160A4F for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 17:05:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 12350 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2016 15:05:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@fluo.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@fluo.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@fluo.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 12338 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2016 15:05:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:05:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3FF6EC307F for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:05:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.879 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2dEAYjj1225l for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f179.google.com (mail-yw0-f179.google.com [209.85.161.179]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 6F30D5FBC7 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f179.google.com with SMTP id j17so16594516ywg.0 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:05:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jQVn3yvOrcvtHKV7VA4VrSDmD7+us/EmwfUzlwPFC6I=; b=RasBIDH2g9d6b86rlkCD6b5EId0+kw8bAn4vt6j4QHcMs4S6K6f3gkeI74qElffDB4 PpIlAeMt60foh0Ci0lmy/GxRI/49mNNp5faeTi/kU7CJK2uSpdb+Gjjq90RtbzU5oOUE 5akwW2GYwMGHgRSDKRIGTAxFK6fdtQQXgNyviLh8RWtnEYIy9Ks9drXCPIhfcuVGdUFf 1Kviqxp7vr4nK1xmQptLCNr4FoQDnoI11hK4H+0UFmDdseYyO5bhFU30PoeCMfW3tWiL FNE5Y3uJgae5V56L3bzrxmaKwV6VuOUaL9D8KlNO2TDmZ9f1lZi3AbbbPX5wUhpjHRSK i7/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=jQVn3yvOrcvtHKV7VA4VrSDmD7+us/EmwfUzlwPFC6I=; b=M0WvCcwrZxPTx0dimQtfyDUhwYbhXsOa9AokrldnPcvYEKNqb8gKKcIQxEdxRbqTKo qMVPLm54I0s+VkGK68nc6kc6AKcuU3Cp8COtFkRCbwbWMpJcZgvYfyG1TTvVWs5RZUaV W7iVipe4c+MGmx9zerZewECKeGck+3lRUUVk6PLy+TtjmiM75XqqS6RvQCTFkRgFPW3n GFpVeRHc35BNNF/kevfMNWc9fIvz3xasKigGdiSi6brDQlqowzj+RQq8ZYwRMWVKe/NG rRw9tYn34x2TM/5hzKPSp74RbxbbXHRD8ZBRZBAY2jX9VbmwxOM7IQgjHFKNKDNgRgmN hcYw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK5xHy6y/Z7zVODnaDrGT+c8Luuj6k9eCVoOng1QRwInmdwGOSux+Wytlgn18GNzbxCd1GPqvmk5Lr2cg== X-Received: by 10.13.247.4 with SMTP id h4mr702638ywf.118.1467903938577; Thu, 07 Jul 2016 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Mike Walch Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:05:29 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Require Java 8 To: dev@fluo.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c07e9f6d2db8905370d04cb archived-at: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 15:05:42 -0000 --94eb2c07e9f6d2db8905370d04cb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:11 PM Christopher wrote: > What do folks think about making all of Fluo require Java 8 as a minimum > before the 1.0.0 release? I think it's a good idea. It'll help with API > modifications over time, and it will simplify some parts of the parent POM. > --94eb2c07e9f6d2db8905370d04cb--