fluo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Walch <mwa...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Projects using GitHub issues
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 19:56:30 GMT
We do have a 'how to contribute' page (
https://fluo.apache.org/how-to-contribute/) but it needs to be updated with
how we are working around problems with GH issues.

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:44 PM Keith Turner <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Ya I groked what you guys were doing this morning, but didn't realize
> that
> > was why.
> >
> > Is there any process written down on the website as it evolves?
> >
>
> No, we can do that.
>
>
> > On Jun 28, 2016 10:06 AM, "Keith Turner" <keith@deenlo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Josh.  We have realized how much of an impediment not being able
> > to
> > > assign and label issues is.  Feel free to point people to our wiki page
> > for
> > > the 1.0.0 release to show what we are doing since we can not label and
> > > assign.  Normally we would have tagged and assigned the issues instead
> of
> > > creating that page.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Josh Elser <josh.elser@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > FYI, I'll be trying to keep an eye on this as well..
> > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > From: "John D. Ament" <johndament@apache.org>
> > > > Date: Jun 28, 2016 7:17 AM
> > > > Subject: Projects using GitHub issues
> > > > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
> > > > Cc:
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I started a discussion on legal discuss, as I was told VP Legal
> > > approved
> > > > > using GitHub issues.  I have no specific concerns, other than
> > ensuring
> > > > that
> > > > > permissions are propagated.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/d2cb0eed30d72976a2f54893f132c1fe300a86d2fdbce1422763c9f0@%3Clegal-discuss.apache.org%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > Its clear to me that legal-discuss isn't where this should start,
> so
> > > I'm
> > > > > not sure why VP Legal approved.  Anyways, I wanted to get opinions
> > from
> > > > the
> > > > > incubator on who should be discussing this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message