Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flume-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flume-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EFAB17383 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95952 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2014 22:17:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flume-user-archive@flume.apache.org Received: (qmail 95894 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2014 22:17:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flume.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flume.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flume.apache.org Received: (qmail 95869 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2014 22:17:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:17:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of hshreedharan@cloudera.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.43] (HELO mail-qa0-f43.google.com) (209.85.216.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:16:47 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j7so94884qaq.2 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:16:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:from:to:cc:subject:content-type; bh=aDGOJlNaddyuoy+m47O9574QmNkwbD9Z3EYd5y6bScg=; b=Y36iSgc+/lROPmTj4PV8h5lD9rfwnWJlasL+4WLO3bb3+N1DzWncUhcbqpmM0GPNNX 4Q55eDNI5be/FBSsKm+NpP8g1QAswIYvm3WYqy1GHqsPqU+oIga7MLGmbKy9KX6oIPIu 6+jo4qWfqUVKN+1aVq0XqFgvwxuV2CHrmRdcUU3eL1Apxghxr5nz+LixA0YrGefexKgu S5DgqynQjQlkGSN37dy58qfn5FVu7IUxeN9wMwVO1E4fJpqSGyAH+D3bUgHuIuEmGRTF n2Xt4I69xelnonMar+CrXdYcJEzd3E07LohG6PvaXRMzlQrTbMlIx5PKH3b0+poOGpQh UBPg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmtRlLDVL/yFQW2p2ps9Z97XMUZqo78TwhCyo3eLRA0d0QI/hvtjXW6P5A2DqQwPD7TuZAa X-Received: by 10.224.129.195 with SMTP id p3mr1643169qas.66.1414016206065; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hedwig-6.prd.orcali.com (ec2-54-85-253-252.compute-1.amazonaws.com. [54.85.253.252]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm72077qag.23.2014.10.22.15.16.45 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:16:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:16:45 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Nodemailer (0.5.0; +http://www.nodemailer.com/) Message-Id: <1414016205258.a3daeb54@Nodemailer> In-Reply-To: References: X-Orchestra-Oid: 2FE6D6DB-122E-4B1D-B683-140A00B22A84 X-Orchestra-Sig: 0beed2fa3d198e499714f960bcbe298fc991796b X-Orchestra-Thrid: TEB56D109-7104-46FE-9747-57A7D6EE5D69_1482462191776666886 X-Orchestra-Thrid-Sig: 10429c3fac7fcda388cbcb9881646ea7c2edb456 X-Orchestra-Account: 77023dd2bf08101f9afafea78771e0c359ee60e2 From: "Hari Shreedharan" To: user@flume.apache.org Cc: user@flume.apache.org Subject: Re: org.apache.avro.AvroRuntimeException: Excessively large list allocation request detected: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1414016205661" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1414016205661 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No, even if it throws an exception it is fine, Avro Sink will retry the = entire batch. Thanks, Hari On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:21 PM, terreyshih wrote: > Hi, > I am seeing this exception while sending avro packets from one agent to = another. It does not seem to affect my business entities though. > I looked at the avro source code and it seems like the exception is = handled by closing the channel and new data is created. > Are the packets lost =3F what does this exception really mean =3F > thx, > -terrey ------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1414016205661 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
No, even if it throws an = exception it is fine, Avro Sink will retry the entire batch.=

Thanks,
Hari


On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:21 = PM, terreyshih <terreyshih@gmail.com> = wrote:

Hi,

I am seeing this exception while sending avro packets from one = agent to another. It does not seem to affect my business entities though.

I looked at the avro source code and it seems like the exception is= handled by closing the channel and new data is created.

Are the packets lost =3F what does this exception really mean =3F

thx,
-terrey


------Nodemailer-0.5.0-?=_1-1414016205661--