Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flume-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flume-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6388011531 for ; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 23:50:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 23656 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2014 23:50:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flume-user-archive@flume.apache.org Received: (qmail 23591 invoked by uid 500); 1 Aug 2014 23:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flume.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flume.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flume.apache.org Received: (qmail 23581 invoked by uid 99); 1 Aug 2014 23:50:30 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:50:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of roshan@hortonworks.com designates 209.85.218.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.49] (HELO mail-oi0-f49.google.com) (209.85.218.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:50:25 +0000 Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id u20so3173294oif.22 for ; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:50:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OzTzp4PznHjMlOjybcVJ7CJmf4NH/btshxWX7mIrzJQ=; b=ccBAus+VEOdBNt3kxhi3zXeenAw0XW1THXqS4cHskczu+u27mHXxztQUhXLl7eTiQ+ qckPX5/TDeA1sURiiuN0Vf/TV8hmEyNW28Yv+TSPn+DKatFasGQP9HS0WIQIiJ00NVa5 WqC6qaSwxjIGLawWf2Zq0KJLWa+dj3oRc+qiy0cI7sTRPwHuFuuQFlA5uMW0Emhr/Q6u XVO6y2UhfWNC3zTZwpqYUuG9Vris9/o9c7UyaSEH3dvqCW6D3GvJn2YXrMfsKFYljP+F RW+eqUK6vGCKgioXHiI1safhD+ugSh9Jl9/imvyVDMCRwvagPzTEzd0Q95J1duNqQIlj JFbg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaht9A7+x/5OXPcQcyMAfMmxbLuptPYPvOAsyRTTC4zCs7CQOBKG8EulOy84XMEMsVydTshfi6M0/tkADgnXWugpC8WlhoKhCjFL27PoL7LJe50tQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.93.67 with SMTP id cs3mr13140979oeb.4.1406937004947; Fri, 01 Aug 2014 16:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.218.51 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:50:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:50:04 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance on Widows vs *NIX From: Roshan Naik To: "user@flume.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b33d17666cf0504ff9a0ce6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b33d17666cf0504ff9a0ce6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Is that a custom Flume build or from some distro ? Hard to say without additional info. anything interesting in the logs when it crashes ? On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Christopher Shannon wrote: > For development and testing, I sometimes have to run multiple agents on > the same server / workstation. Recently I had to load test a second agent > in a Windows environment with a near identical configuration (except for > paths and more memory allocated to the JVM), but the agent in the second > JVM soon ground to a halt whereas the first JVM with less memory worked > without slowdown. > > The total physicsl memory on the machine is 32 gb, and the total physical > RAM used never exceds 14GB. Disk space is plentiful. Agent A (started > first) has a max JVM heap space of 4 gb, the second JVM (Agent B) has 8 gb > allocated. Both use a spooling file source, a memory channel, and an Avro > sink. > > Yet agent B is the one that slows down and evetually hangs. I have stood > up multiple Flume agents on Linux without this problem. > > What could account for the degrading performance in a Windows environment > for the second agent but not the first? > > All the best, Chris > > p.s. The agent version is 1.3.0, and I can't change it for contractual > reasons. > -- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You. --047d7b33d17666cf0504ff9a0ce6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Is that a custom Flume build or from some distro ? Hard to= say without additional info. anything interesting in =C2=A0the logs when i= t crashes ?


On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Christopher Shannon <cshannon108= @gmail.com> wrote:

For development and testing, = I sometimes have to run multiple agents on the same server / workstation. R= ecently I had to load test a second agent in a Windows environment with a n= ear identical configuration (except for paths and more memory allocated to = the JVM), but the agent in the second JVM soon ground to a halt whereas the= first JVM with less memory worked without slowdown.

The total physicsl memory on the machine is 32 gb, and the t= otal physical RAM used never exceds 14GB. Disk space is plentiful. Agent A = (started first) has a max JVM heap space of 4 gb, the second JVM (Agent B) = has 8 gb allocated. Both use a spooling file source, a memory channel, and = an Avro sink.

Yet agent B is the one that slows down and evetually hangs. = I have stood up multiple Flume agents on Linux without this problem.

What could account for the degrading performance in a Window= s environment for the second agent but not the first?

All the best, Chris

p.s. The agent version is 1.3.0, and I can't change it f= or contractual reasons.



CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is = intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed a= nd may contain information that is confidential, privileged and exempt from= disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the = intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, dis= semination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is= strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, ple= ase contact the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank Yo= u. --047d7b33d17666cf0504ff9a0ce6--