Mailing-List: contact user-help@flume.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@flume.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jagadish.bihani@pubmatic.com
 designates 64.78.56.61 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <516E3D5D.5060105@pubmatic.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 11:42:45 +0530
From: Jagadish Bihani <jagadish.bihani@pubmatic.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <user@flume.apache.org>
Subject: Re: "single source - multi channel" scenario  and applying
 interceptor
 while writing to only one channel and not on others...possible approaches
References: <516CF15C.2000509@pubmatic.com>
In-Reply-To: <516CF15C.2000509@pubmatic.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi

If anybody has any inputs on this that will surely help.

Regards,
Jagadish

On 04/16/2013 12:06 PM, Jagadish Bihani wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have a use case in which
> 1. spooling source reads data.
> 2. It needs to write events into multiple channels. It should apply
> interceptor only when putting into one channel and should put
> the event as it is while putting into another channel.
>
> Possible approach we have thought:
>
> 1. Create  2 different sources and then apply interceptor on one and dont
> apply on other. But that duplicates reads and increases IO.
>
> Is there any better way of achieving this use case?
>
> Regards,
> Jagadish
>