flume-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Lior Zeno <liorz...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Improving Flume distribution packaging
Date Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:43:41 GMT
I was not aware of BigTop, I do not think we should duplicate their work
here.
Maybe they will publish docker images as well in the future.

On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Mike Percy <mpercy@apache.org> wrote:

> Currently rpms are handled by downstream projects like Apache BigTop as
> well as commercial distributions. So in my view it's a duplication of
> efforts there, particularly since BigTop and distributions based on it also
> harmonize dependencies to a certain extent and we mark many of our
> dependencies as "provided".
>
> So it's possible but not sure it's worth the effort since Flume depends on
> so many other projects like Hadoop, HBase, etc
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Lior Zeno <liorzino@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Currently, we distribute Flume via a tarball. I think we should improve
> and
> > also publish deb and rpm packages that allow running Flume as a service.
> >
> > More over, container technology, such as Docker, has become increasingly
> > popular in last few years. Publishing an official Docker image will allow
> > easier deployment of Flume in the cloud.
> >
> > How do you guys feel about this?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message