flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
Subject Re: Alink and Flink ML
Date Mon, 09 Mar 2020 14:30:38 GMT
Thanks Marta for the clarification!

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:26 PM Marta Paes Moreira <marta@ververica.com>
wrote:

> Hi, Flavio.
>
> Indeed, Becket is the best person to answer this question, but as far as I
> understand the idea is that Alink will be contributed back to Flink in the
> form of a refactored Flink ML library (sitting on top of the Table API)
> [1]. You can follow the progress of these efforts by tracking FLIP-39 [2].
>
> [1] https://developpaper.com/why-is-flink-ai-worth-looking-forward-to/
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-39+Flink+ML+pipeline+and+ML+libs
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:02 PM Gary Yao <gary@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Flavio,
>>
>> I am looping in Becket (cc'ed) who might be able to answer your question.
>>
>> Best,
>> Gary
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 12:19 PM Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi to all,
>>> since Alink has been open sourced, is there any good reason to keep both
>>> Flink ML and Alink?
>>> From what I understood Alink already contains the best ML implementation
>>> available for Flink..am I wrong?
>>> Maybe it could make sense to replace the current Flink ML with that of
>>> Alink..or is that impossible?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Flavio
>>>
>>

Mime
View raw message