flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anyang Hu <huanyang1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: suggestion of FLINK-10868
Date Fri, 06 Sep 2019 09:42:14 GMT
Thank you for the reply and look forward to the advice of Till.

Anyang

Peter Huang <huangzhenqiu0825@gmail.com> 于2019年9月5日周四 下午11:53写道:

> Hi Anyang,
>
> Thanks for raising it up. I think it is reasonable as what you requested
> is needed for batch. Let's wait for Till to give some more input.
>
>
>
> Best Regards
> Peter Huang
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 7:02 AM Anyang Hu <huanyang1024@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Peter&Till:
>>
>> As commented in the issue
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10868#>,We have introduced
>> the FLINK-10868 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10868> patch
>> (mainly batch tasks) online, what do you think of the following two
>> suggestions:
>>
>> 1) Parameter control time interval. At present, the default time
>> interval of 1 min is used, which is too short for batch tasks;
>>
>> 2)Parameter Control When the failed Container number reaches
>> MAXIMUM_WORKERS_FAILURE_RATE and JM disconnects whether to perform
>> OnFatalError so that the batch tasks can exit as soon as possible.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Anyang
>>
>

Mime
View raw message