flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
Subject Re: RichMapFunction parameters in the Streaming API
Date Wed, 11 Oct 2017 10:12:04 GMT
I think we should remove that part from the best-practices documentation. I'll quickly open
a PR.

> On 11. Oct 2017, at 10:46, Chesnay Schepler <chesnay@apache.org> wrote:
> The Configuration parameter in open() is a relic of the previous java API where operators
were instantiated generically.
> Nowadays, this is no longer the case as they are serialized instead, which simplifies
the passing of parameters as you can
> simply store them in a field of your UDF.
> The configuration object passed to open() in case of the streaming API is always empty,
and we don't plan
> to implement it since it provides little value due to the above.
> As such, we suggest to pass either the parameter tool, configuration instance or specific
parameters through the constructor of user-defined functions and store them in a field. This
applies both to the batch and streaming API.
> Personally i would stay away from the global configuration option as it is more brittle
than the constructor approach, which makes
> it explicit that this function requires these parameters.
> On 11.10.2017 00:36, Colin Williams wrote:
>> I was looking for withParameters(config) in the Streaming API today. I stumbled across
the following thread.
>> http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/withParameters-for-Streaming-API-td9332.html#a9333
>> It appears that some of the StreamingAPI developers are in favor of removing the
parameters from RichMapFunctions' open. However the best practices article
>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.3/dev/best_practices.html#using-the-parameters-in-your-flink-program
>> Show examples of using both global configuration (where parameters are available
from open) and withParameters(config) (which doesn't work from the Streaming API)
>> I'm trying to make a decision regarding using global parameters with my Flink Streaming
>> Is using the global configuration a good idea for parameters in the Streaming API
or is this best practice just suggested for the Batch API?
>> Is there a reason for the opinion of removing the configuration parameters from open?

View raw message