flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Richter <s.rich...@data-artisans.com>
Subject Re: Checkpointing SIGSEGV
Date Sat, 27 May 2017 18:28:38 GMT
Hi,

this is a known and currently „accepted“ problem in Flink which can only happen when a
task manager is already going down, e.g. on cancelation. It happens when the RocksDB object
was already disposed (as part of the shutdown procedure) but there is still a pending timer
firing, and in the process accessing the released native resource. 

Background why it is like that: waiting for all timer to finish could potentially take time
and we want shutdown to be as fast as possible so that we can bring up the task again asap.

Best,
Stefan

> Am 27.05.2017 um 16:19 schrieb Yassine MARZOUGUI <y.marzougui@mindlytix.com>:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This might be related, I'm experiencing a similar SIGSEGV causing the taskmanager to
die each time my streaming job fails or even if I cancel it manually.
> I am using Flink1.4-SNAPSHOT, Commit: 546e2ad.
> 
> Here are some examples (see the full dump attached):
> 
> On Job failure:
> #
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
> #
> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007f244f4cf5b3, pid=9532, tid=0x00007f24474fc700
> #
> # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (8.0_121-b13) (build 1.8.0_121-b13)
> # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.121-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 compressed oops)
> # Problematic frame:
> # C  [librocksdbjni-linux64.so+0x1dd5b3]  rocksdb::DBImpl::GetImpl(rocksdb::ReadOptions
const&, rocksdb::ColumnFamilyHandle*, rocksdb::Slice const&, std::string*, bool*)+0xe3
> #
> # Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core dumping, try
"ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
> #
> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
> #   http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp <http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp>
> # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
> # See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
> #
> 
> On job Cancel:
> #
> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
> #
> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007fdd2815c280, pid=4503, tid=0x00007fdc14d48700
> #
> # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (8.0_121-b13) (build 1.8.0_121-b13)
> # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (25.121-b13 mixed mode linux-amd64 compressed oops)
> # Problematic frame:
> # C  0x00007fdd2815c280
> #
> # Failed to write core dump. Core dumps have been disabled. To enable core dumping, try
"ulimit -c unlimited" before starting Java again
> #
> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
> #   http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp <http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp>
> # The crash happened outside the Java Virtual Machine in native code.
> # See problematic frame for where to report the bug.
> #
> 
> Side question : Isn't the jobmanager supposed to restart the taskmnanager if it is lost/killed?
> 
> Best,
> Yassine
> 
> 
> 2017-05-27 1:32 GMT+02:00 Stefan Richter <s.richter@data-artisans.com <mailto:s.richter@data-artisans.com>>:
> Flink’s version is hosted here: https://github.com/dataArtisans/frocksdb <https://github.com/dataArtisans/frocksdb>
> 
>> Am 26.05.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Jason Brelloch <jb.bc.flk@gmail.com <mailto:jb.bc.flk@gmail.com>>:
>> 
>> Thanks for looking into this Stefan.  We are moving forward with a different strategy
for now.  If I want to take a look at this, where do I go to get the Flink version of RocksDB?
>> 
>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Stefan Richter <s.richter@data-artisans.com <mailto:s.richter@data-artisans.com>>
wrote:
>> I forgot to mention that you need to run this with Flink’s version of RocksDB,
as the stock version is already unable to perform the inserts because their implementation
of merge operator has a performance problem.
>> 
>> Furthermore, I think a higher multiplicator than *2 is required on num (and/or a
smaller modulo on the key bytes) to trigger the problem; Noticed that I ran it multiple times,
so it added up to bigger sizes over the runs.
>> 
>>> Am 26.05.2017 um 18:42 schrieb Stefan Richter <s.richter@data-artisans.com
<mailto:s.richter@data-artisans.com>>:
>>> 
>>> I played a bit around with your info and this looks now like a general problem
in RocksDB to me. Or more specifically, between RocksDB and the JNI bridge. I could reproduce
the issue with the following simple test code:
>>> 
>>> File rocksDir = new File("/tmp/rocks");
>>> final Options options = new Options()
>>>    .setCreateIfMissing(true)
>>>    .setMergeOperator(new StringAppendOperator())
>>>    .setCompactionStyle(CompactionStyle.LEVEL)
>>>    .setLevelCompactionDynamicLevelBytes(true)
>>>    .setIncreaseParallelism(4)
>>>    .setUseFsync(false)
>>>    .setMaxOpenFiles(-1)
>>>    .setAllowOsBuffer(true)
>>>    .setDisableDataSync(true);
>>> 
>>> final WriteOptions write_options = new WriteOptions()
>>>    .setSync(false)
>>>    .setDisableWAL(true);
>>> 
>>> try (final RocksDB rocksDB = RocksDB.open(options, rocksDir.getAbsolutePath()))
{
>>>    final String key = "key";
>>>    final String value = "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ7890654321";
>>> 
>>>    byte[] keyBytes = key.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
>>>    keyBytes = Arrays.copyOf(keyBytes, keyBytes.length + 1);
>>>    final byte[] valueBytes = value.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
>>>    final int num = (Integer.MAX_VALUE / valueBytes.length) * 2;
>>> 
>>>    System.out.println("begin insert");
>>> 
>>>    final long beginInsert = System.nanoTime();
>>>    for (int i = 0; i < num; i++) {
>>>       keyBytes[keyBytes.length - 1] = (byte) (i % 9);
>>>       rocksDB.merge(write_options, keyBytes, valueBytes);
>>>    }
>>>    final long endInsert = System.nanoTime();
>>>    System.out.println("end insert - duration: " + ((endInsert - beginInsert)
/ 1_000_000) + " ms");
>>> 
>>>    final long beginGet = System.nanoTime();
>>>    try (RocksIterator iterator = rocksDB.newIterator()) {
>>>       iterator.seekToFirst();
>>> 
>>>       while (iterator.isValid()) {
>>>          iterator.next();
>>>          byte[] bytes = iterator.value();
>>>          System.out.println(bytes.length + " " + bytes[bytes.length - 1]);
>>>       }
>>>    }
>>>    final long endGet = System.nanoTime();
>>> 
>>>    System.out.println("end get - duration: " + ((endGet - beginGet) / 1_000_000)
+ " ms");
>>> }
>>> 
>>> Depending on how smooth the 1.3 release is going, maybe I find some time next
week to take a closer look into this. If this is urgent, please also feel free to already
report this problem to the RocksDB issue tracker.
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> Stefan
>>> 
>>>> Am 26.05.2017 um 16:40 schrieb Jason Brelloch <jb.bc.flk@gmail.com <mailto:jb.bc.flk@gmail.com>>:
>>>> 
>>>> ~2 GB was the total state in the backend.  The total number of keys in the
test is 10 with an approximately even distribution of state across keys, and parallelism of
1 so all keys are on the same taskmanager.  We are using ListState and the number of elements
per list would be about 500000.
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Stefan Richter <s.richter@data-artisans.com
<mailto:s.richter@data-artisans.com>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> what means „our state“ in this context? The total state in the backend
or the state under one key? If you use, e.g. list state, I could see that the state for one
key can grow above 2GB, but once we retrieve the state back from RocksDB as Java arrays (in
your stacktrace, when making a checkpoint), which are bounded in size to a maximum of 2GB
(Integer.MAX_VALUE) and maybe that is what happens in JNI if you try to go beyond that limit.
Could that be a reason for your problem?
>>>> 
>>>>> Am 26.05.2017 um 15:50 schrieb Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org
<mailto:rmetzger@apache.org>>:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jason,
>>>>> 
>>>>> This error is unexpected. I don't think its caused by insufficient memory.
I'm including Stefan into the conversation, he's the RocksDB expert :)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Jason Brelloch <jb.bc.flk@gmail.com
<mailto:jb.bc.flk@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> Hey guys,
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are running into a JVM crash on checkpointing when our rocksDB state
reaches a certain size on a taskmanager (about 2GB).  The issue happens with both a hadoop
backend and just writing to a local file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> We are running on Flink 1.2.1.
>>>>> 
>>>>> #
>>>>> # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
>>>>> #
>>>>> #  SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x00007febf4261b42, pid=1, tid=0x00007fead135f700
>>>>> #
>>>>> # JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (8.0_131-b11) (build 1.8.0_131-b11)
>>>>> # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (25.131-b11 mixed mode linux-amd64
compressed oops)
>>>>> # Problematic frame:
>>>>> # V  [libjvm.so+0x6d1b42]  jni_SetByteArrayRegion+0xc2
>>>>> #
>>>>> # Core dump written. Default location: //core or core.1
>>>>> #
>>>>> # An error report file with more information is saved as:
>>>>> # /tmp/hs_err_pid1.log
>>>>> #
>>>>> # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
>>>>> #   http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp <http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp>
>>>>> #
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is this an issue with not enough memory?  Or maybe not enough allocated
to rocksDB?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I have attached the taskmanager logs, and the core dump.  The jobmanager
logs just say taskmanger lost/killed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Jason Brelloch | Product Developer
>>>>> 3405 Piedmont Rd. NE, Suite 325, Atlanta, GA 30305 
>>>>>  <http://www.bettercloud.com/>
>>>>> Subscribe to the BetterCloud Monitor <https://www.bettercloud.com/monitor?utm_source=bettercloud_email&utm_medium=email_signature&utm_campaign=monitor_launch>
- Get IT delivered to your inbox
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Jason Brelloch | Product Developer
>>>> 3405 Piedmont Rd. NE, Suite 325, Atlanta, GA 30305 
>>>>  <http://www.bettercloud.com/>
>>>> Subscribe to the BetterCloud Monitor <https://www.bettercloud.com/monitor?utm_source=bettercloud_email&utm_medium=email_signature&utm_campaign=monitor_launch>
- Get IT delivered to your inbox
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jason Brelloch | Product Developer
>> 3405 Piedmont Rd. NE, Suite 325, Atlanta, GA 30305 
>>  <http://www.bettercloud.com/>
>> Subscribe to the BetterCloud Monitor <https://www.bettercloud.com/monitor?utm_source=bettercloud_email&utm_medium=email_signature&utm_campaign=monitor_launch>
- Get IT delivered to your inbox
> 
> 
> <hs_err_pid4503.log><hs_err_pid9532.log>


Mime
View raw message