Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C43200C13 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:12:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 74651160B53; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id BA9C8160B49 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:12:02 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 47866 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2017 09:12:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 47851 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2017 09:12:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:12:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 20346C02A5 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:12:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.692 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.692 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URI_HEX=1.313] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nrz4agyDG07D for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8D9435F283 for ; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 09:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c85so110734378wmi.1 for ; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 01:11:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S65E1UplhbQmWtMi77X/D1t+n9eCINjN+Kaa79+x+u8=; b=tQul3EyhSv/EfSlhPlYjCHVVO/lDoTe46t2ASlJBH89lDe6FDZI3OGa7Qlz8nyqGgL jCru2FC6zp3hU0beXmAoXVlZz6LpW0SrDR7epuuNYb/UZRgQhhv7NZn3x8KlPaaxOrzT UQlAC8OVZF9xhbMFmiYtEQAYeQ8EETrJZPNUPIXTMglIzWWfEe/LLjM6pgvepK0scvdI qj8Z2go9D/U5XDo+0SJKM298m/2Dh4cLonDZlwqOTAt83TEJr0CFG9BVxOmAH1GCLelG ny8oH+fHYMABw83sp4vDv9GFrbdK5bZgyt6dO9xHJzjzy+0xF+KOSR1Ok6LxbbxjxFYK YKkQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=S65E1UplhbQmWtMi77X/D1t+n9eCINjN+Kaa79+x+u8=; b=tNQs+1y+f/sQuUH9WPC59V+gw9BW0jsLldhGNwkBDpdme53VWO8SUm7StTdD82meE/ FaiRxj5cpzgEj1GcCAk1LKJPJryylM48tdLyiGCa3eMYi+avm1XEo1yGqAi0Hq9QBFgd PIa0HdtM6cyqg2L+idfH68sX5KnCRczpeRrvkK/MyiGX83bITukrOXijbfNsiyWKGnUm R3RvvbyLjndzXCdJ29kKHP6OYK2DjABUZg6mJo5iZ5Qs42zVaKvCVHd1Wex+zQBHOlFs dLXahtHOJwte+NOD0x5NASgQ/x6+otnFda3eal6yTp/q8vptOlQWUDY0580tiqltx8L7 sYmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI9H5b6LK3IdG+kWgBDTqP422YC9O24/+wNgDSAGT60u0ejWKJxAj4wJHXzE7Zr558IUrHFaLrLa7VXdQ== X-Received: by 10.223.175.36 with SMTP id z33mr8229800wrc.25.1486372317768; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 01:11:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.113.99 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:11:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1486328838408-11447.post@n4.nabble.com> References: <1485280335524-11272.post@n4.nabble.com> <1485369790956-11301.post@n4.nabble.com> <1485372216438-11305.post@n4.nabble.com> <1485378708692-11307.post@n4.nabble.com> <4BF9D1C3-58D1-4250-A6E2-4D7E52B72B60@gmail.com> <1485433385124-11311.post@n4.nabble.com> <1486328838408-11447.post@n4.nabble.com> From: Fabian Hueske Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:11:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Improving Flink Performance To: user@flink.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045f56200133030547d90692 archived-at: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 09:12:03 -0000 --f403045f56200133030547d90692 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Jonas, thanks for reporting back! Glad you solve the issue. Cheers, Fabian 2017-02-05 22:07 GMT+01:00 Jonas : > Using a profiler I found out that the main performance problem (80%) was > spent in a domain specific data structure. After implementing it with a > more > efficient one, the performance problems are gone. > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user- > mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Improving-Flink- > Performance-tp11248p11447.html > Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive > at Nabble.com. > --f403045f56200133030547d90692 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Jonas,

thanks for reporting back= !
Glad you solve the issue.

Cheers, F= abian

20= 17-02-05 22:07 GMT+01:00 Jonas <jonas@huntun.de>:
Using a profiler I found out that the main performanc= e problem (80%) was
spent in a domain specific data structure. After implementing it with a mor= e
efficient one, the performance problems are gone.



--
View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-m= ailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Improving-Flink-Perform= ance-tp11248p11447.html
Sent from the Apache Flink User Mai= ling List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--f403045f56200133030547d90692--