Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A837200BD9 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:27:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8920D160B1C; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 13:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AD48E160B04 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:27:31 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 1750 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2016 13:27:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 1740 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2016 13:27:30 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:27:30 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0E993C1372 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 13:27:30 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.379 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.379 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9IMnVaIHgTzn for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 13:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wj0-f177.google.com (mail-wj0-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 50F925FCD2 for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 13:27:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wj0-f177.google.com with SMTP id xy5so14675103wjc.0 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:27:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=8HHEMB8P75YGcxyEZBzEXRur+ZkJXE5OTqjB6d50oVI=; b=Z+ieYPLDk3lFCdlU+8Wb5hTg4oWYuNRe7tVotgQqf8cKQYzVF50b8RdrBsQwvd9tGd 3FF6Q5eXF1zL7NnKm8jMkVs4G00RcUAxxdISae6TzKRU4D4DvX8cY7BmHpaBnns94k3i uzpGxw3xuMmWwveAogveAkpHg3MEYRZyQe8RPFG1F1eUak834x1B6CtUmWf+tyqOFjUn IHDGhKdpKPblQwece6HgnFSzU/XgtuMjrsGZXmiuS7I/WGvv7o/jXu20jktWmuEGNVW2 Z5YzmN+lZBuTzoP/W9YOo9F0uBkmxqHtWuLIKDkUynxBvkaUmhb2i18uZ6n8SkxdWPKh 22kA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=8HHEMB8P75YGcxyEZBzEXRur+ZkJXE5OTqjB6d50oVI=; b=Q5/zYg5uRiMNHWEK3d2iMQ1mwgI8Pr/Uiyi8dB4NTNM9HeoC0AMPYctAkp5yfRH59z UJCW/5nlhTqmNH58zzjIsP9jESUzpecW6lZwpC4psPeXsVfioTRgJlUMkKPJbVRR5KuL iIBSbeIUzqYfE9crVNBE0I4Nzp85yktYHwstdDX3egii7y6dTyPpIYDqNMKxHSUYqZtQ X7D8Rfsao4f8GeKMFBqmyPP8m0y1bPwCO3TQaI4+uwy4rriVOpurYdD6ZhEDkmV3X57B pt9HTpn55ilUDFsjzuiKn5utx5aQ3efJf2tAvSFnI+GWGoGC1+GztcYGpQyQ/2bkiblZ COgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC023YP8NHaBZnjfJMfMnU3hK041Pi6IQyiY75s9u3pM4oRekefSrQpyUCgeizp7Q3c/JL9HM1oHdBZflog== X-Received: by 10.194.177.231 with SMTP id ct7mr70030954wjc.221.1481290047603; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 05:27:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.156.83 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 05:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.28.156.83 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 05:27:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <8B754047F81D6B4290B9F4CE928333A517BDABD0@lhreml503-mbx> From: Felix Neutatz Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 14:27:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] "Who's hiring on Flink" monthly thread in the mailing lists? To: user@flink.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6040f418d265054339b7e9 archived-at: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 13:27:32 -0000 --047d7b6040f418d265054339b7e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, I wonder whether a mailing list is a good choice for that in general. If I am looking for a job I won't register for a mailing list or browse through the archive of one but rather search it via Google. So what about putting it on a dedicated site on the Web Page. This feels more intuitive to me and gives a better overview. Best regards, Felix On Dec 9, 2016 14:20, "Ufuk Celebi" wrote: On 9 December 2016 at 14:13:14, Robert Metzger (rmetzger@apache.org) wrote: > I'm against using the news@ list for that. > The promise of the news@ list is that its low-traffic and only for news. If > we now start having job offers (and potentially some questions on them > etc.) it'll be a list with more than some announcements. > That's also the reason why the news@ list is completely moderated. I agree with Robert. I would consider that to be spam if posted to news@. --047d7b6040f418d265054339b7e9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,

I wonder= whether a mailing list is a good choice for that in general. If I am looki= ng for a job I won't register for a mailing list or browse through the = archive of one but rather search it via Google. So what about putting it on= a dedicated site on the Web Page. This feels more intuitive to me and give= s a better overview.

Bes= t regards,
Felix

On Dec 9, 2016 14:20, "Ufuk Celebi&q= uot; <uce@apache.org> wrote:
<= br>

On 9 December 2016 at 14:13:14, Robert Metzger (rmetzger@apache.org) wrote:
> I'm against using the news@ list for that.
> The promise of the news@ list is that its low-traffic and only for new= s. If
> we now start having job offers (and potentially some questions on them=
> etc.) it'll be a list with more than some announcements.
> That's also the reason why the news@ list is completely moderated.=

I agree with Robert. I would consider that to be spam if posted to ne= ws@.



--047d7b6040f418d265054339b7e9--