flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Flink on YARN - Fault Tolerance | use case supported or not
Date Mon, 31 Oct 2016 15:29:27 GMT
Hi Anchit!

In high-availability cases, a Flink cluster recovers jobs that it considers
belonging to the cluster. That is determined by what is set in the
Zookeeper Cluster Namespace: "recovery.zookeeper.path.namespace"
https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/release-1.1.3/flink-core/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/configuration/ConfigConstants.java#L646

If you submit the job in the "per-job-yarn" mode (via 'bin/flink run -m
yarn-cluster ...') then this gets a unique auto-generated namespace. The
assumption is that the job recovers itself as long as the yarn job keeps
running. If you force yarn to terminate the job, it is gone.

If you start a "yarn session", then it picks up the namespace from the
config. If you kill that yarn session while jobs are running, and then
start a new session with the same namespace, it will start recovering the
previously running jobs.

Does that make sense?

Greetings,
Stephan



On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Kostas Kloudas <k.kloudas@data-artisans.com
> wrote:

> Hi Jatana,
>
> As you pointed out, the correct way to do the above is to use savepoints.
> If you kill your application, then this is not a crass but rather a
> voluntary action.
>
> I am also looping in Max, as he may have something more to say on this.
>
> Cheers,
> Kostas
>
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Anchit Jatana <
> development.anchit@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I tried testing fault tolerance in a different way(not sure if it as
>> appropriate way) of my running flink application. I ran the flink
>> application on YARN and after completing few checkpoints, killed the YARN
>> application using:
>>
>> yarn application -kill application_1476277440022_xxxx
>>
>> Further, tried restarting the application by providing the same path of
>> the checkpointing directory. The application started afresh and did not
>> resume from the last check-pointed state. Just wanted to make sure if fault
>> tolerance in this usecase is valid or not. If yes, what am I doing wrong?
>>
>> I'm aware of the savepoint process- to create savepoint, stop the
>> application and resume new application from the same savepoint but wished
>> to check the above usecase considering the fact that for some reason if the
>> YARN application gets killed perhaps accidentally or due to any other
>> reason, is this kind of fault tolerance supported or not.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Anchit
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message