flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Task and Operator Monitoring via JMX / naming
Date Thu, 20 Oct 2016 07:27:24 GMT
This is completely unintended behavior; you should never have to adjust 
your topology so the metric system get's the names right.

I'll take a deep look into this tomorrow ;)


On 20.10.2016 08:50, Philipp Bussche wrote:
> Some further observations: I had a Job which was taking events of a Kafka
> topic and sending it to two sinks whereas for one of them a Map operation
> would happen first. When creating one event stream and sending it to the two
> sinks the JMX representation was not showing both sinks and the naming of
> the Map operation was also not right. But when creating two event streams in
> the job (basically two Kafka consumers doing the exact same) and then
> sending each to one sink the naming changed and seem to look like what I
> would expect.
> A question remains though if it is best practise anyways to do one thing
> with a Job only (like one map operation and one distribution to a sink) and
> hence having multiple streams is the way to go or if this is still
> unexpected behaviour what I see in my environment and should be fixed ?
> Thanks
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Task-and-Operator-Monitoring-via-JMX-naming-tp9560p9642.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

View raw message