Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id C179F200B78 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id C0053160AAB; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 390BA160AAC for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:25:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 48597 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2016 13:25:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 48585 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2016 13:25:42 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 13:25:42 +0000 Received: from mail-vk0-f49.google.com (mail-vk0-f49.google.com [209.85.213.49]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id BA3541A0327 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id f76so23028721vke.0 for ; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 06:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMCN3p9e2DychCEKvfrxYAbLh1T2qkzTAAVI5xCGwvq1lp5NWpKXtlJlWsvJtyrLOfg8iEhoSg6eeD99lks X-Received: by 10.31.192.2 with SMTP id q2mr11234006vkf.44.1472822740932; Fri, 02 Sep 2016 06:25:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.41.3 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 06:25:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Maximilian Michels Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:25:20 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] Storm 1.x.x support in the compatibility layer To: dev@flink.apache.org Cc: "user@flink.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 13:25:43 -0000 This should be of concern mostly to the users of the Storm compatibility layer: We just received a pull request [1] for updating the Storm compatibility layer to support Storm versions >= 1.0.0. This is a major change because all Storm imports have changed their namespace due to package renaming. If we merged this pull request we would have two modules, one for Storm < 1.0.0 and one for Storm >= 1.0.0. This would require a lot of duplicate work for the Flink community. Thus, I would suggest to remove the Storm compatibility for < 1.0.0 and focus on supporting 1.x.x versions of Storm. What do you think? In particular, how do Storm users think about this? Cheers, Max [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2452