flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Release notes 1.1.0?
Date Wed, 10 Aug 2016 13:33:52 GMT
Hi Andrew!

Here is the reason for what is happening with your job:

You have used some sort of undocumented and unofficial corner case behavior
of Flink 1.0.0, namely, using parallel windowAll().
Initially, windowAll() was supposed to not be parallel, but the system did
not prevent to set a parallelism.

In Flink 1.0.0 it just happened that a parallel windowAll() behaved like a
"window over stream partition".
In Flink 1.1.0, the parallel windowAll() really sends all data to one of
the parallel operators, and the others are idle. Admittedly, Flink 1.1.0
should simply not allow to set a parallelism on windowAll() - we will fix
that.

What we need to figure out now is how to have an adequate replacement for
the "window over stream partition" use case. I think we need to add an
explicit "windowPartition()" function for that case.

Until then, you could stay on Flink 1.0.3 or you can try and use instead of
"windowAll()" a "keyBy().window()" operator and use an incrementing
number%24 as a key (would not be perfectly balanced, but a temporary
workaround):

stream
    .keyBy(new KeySelector<SocialData, Integer>() {
        private int key;

        @Override
        public Integer getKey(SocialData data) {
            if (++key >= 24) {
                key = 0;
            }
            return key;
        }
    })
    .timeWindow(Time.milliseconds(100))
    .apply(...)


Sorry for the inconvenience!

Greetings,
Stephan



On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge-wu@eniro.com>
wrote:

> Hi Aljoscha
>
> We are not using state backend explicitly, recovery and state backend are
> pointed to file path.
> See attached json file
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential
> or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual
> or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies
> of this message.
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
> Andrew
>
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 11:38, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Oh, are you by any chance specifying a custom state backend for your job?
> For example, RocksDBStateBackend.
>
> Cheers,
> Aljoscha
>
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016 at 11:17 Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> could you maybe send us the output of "env.getExecutionPlan()". This
>> would help us better understand which operators are used exactly. (You can
>> of course remove any security sensitive stuff.)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Aljoscha
>>
>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 15:30 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge-wu@eniro.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Oh sorry missed that part, no, Im not explicitly set that.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 15:29, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> are you setting a StreamTimeCharacteristic, i.e. env.
>>> setStreamTimeCharacteristic?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Aljoscha
>>>
>>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 14:52 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge-wu@eniro.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Aljoscha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Plan attached, there are split streams and union operations around, but
>>>> here is how windows are created
>>>>
>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>>> confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for
>>>> the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the
>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies
>>>> of this message.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know if I’m doing something out of ordinary here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 14:18, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> could you maybe post how exactly you specify the window? Also, did you
>>>> set a "stream time characteristic", for example EventTime?
>>>>
>>>> That could help us pinpoint the problem.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Aljoscha
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 12:42 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge-wu@eniro.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I rolled back to 1.0.3
>>>>>
>>>> If I understand this correctly, the peak when topology starts is
>>>>> because it is trying to fill all the buffers, but I can not see that
in
>>>>> 1.1.0.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 12:10, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Which source are you using?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge-wu@eniro.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Robert
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the quick reply, I guess I’m one of the early birds.
>>>>>> Yes, it is much slower, I’m not sure why, I copied slaves, masters,
>>>>>> log4j.properties and flink-conf.yaml directly from 1.0.3
>>>>>> I have parallelization 1 on my sources, I can increase that to
>>>>>> achieve the same speed, but I’m interested to know why is that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 11:47, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> here is the release announcement, with a list of all changes:
>>>>>> http://flink.apache.org/news/2016/08/08/release-1.1.0.html,
>>>>>> http://flink.apache.org/blog/release_1.1.0-changelog.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does the chart say? Are the results different? is Flink faster
>>>>>> or slower now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Robert
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge-wu@eniro.com
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We found out there is a new stable version released: 1.1.0 but
we
>>>>>>> can not find any release note.
>>>>>>> Do anyone know where to find it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We are experience some change of behavior, I’m not sure if
it is
>>>>>>> related.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andrew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>>>>>> confidential or legally privileged information that is intended
only for
>>>>>>> the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you
are not the
>>>>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying,
>>>>>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is
strictly
>>>>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
in error,
>>>>>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
all copies
>>>>>>> of this message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>>>>> confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only
for
>>>>>> the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are
not the
>>>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying,
>>>>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
>>>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail
in error,
>>>>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
all copies
>>>>>> of this message.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>>>> confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only
for
>>>>> the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not
the
>>>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
>>>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all
copies
>>>>> of this message.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>> confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for
>>> the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the
>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies
>>> of this message.
>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message