Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4596B200B21 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:19:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 442EB160A38; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:19:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B867160A04 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:19:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 2387 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2016 10:19:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 2374 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2016 10:19:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:19:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 287ECC0AB6 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:19:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wpgV3JVVrfcT for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.mailbox.org (mx2.mailbox.org [80.241.60.215]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A55845F295 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC620434C5 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:18:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by gerste.heinlein-support.de (gerste.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.173]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id a6r-kmWbsETb for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:18:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Join two streams using a count-based window To: user@flink.apache.org References: From: "Matthias J. Sax" Message-ID: <575A936F.7060109@apache.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:16:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E4G6UUuOtomXpb8kNlRnqOsJrtdduAEg2" archived-at: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:19:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --E4G6UUuOtomXpb8kNlRnqOsJrtdduAEg2 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="SKmjn7MmVx1ebXLdEHBSvgtq3PMUFbMvk" From: "Matthias J. Sax" To: user@flink.apache.org Message-ID: <575A936F.7060109@apache.org> Subject: Re: Join two streams using a count-based window References: In-Reply-To: --SKmjn7MmVx1ebXLdEHBSvgtq3PMUFbMvk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just put an answer to SO. About the other questions: Flink processes tuple-by-tuple and does some internal buffering. You might be interested in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Data+exchange+between+t= asks -Matthias On 06/09/2016 08:13 PM, Nikos R. Katsipoulakis wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > At first, I have a question posted on > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37732978/join-two-streams-using-a-co= unt-based-window > . I am re-posting this on the mailing list in case some of you are not > on SO. >=20 > In addition, I would like to know what is the difference between Flink > and other Streaming engines on data-granularity transport and > processing. To be more precise, I am aware that Storm sends tuples usin= g > Netty (by filling up queues) and a Bolt's logic is executed per tuple. > Spark, employs micro-batches to simulate streaming and (I am not > entirely certain) each task performs processing on a micro-batch. What > about Flink? How are tuples transferred and processed. Any explanation > and or article/blog-post/link is more than welcome. >=20 > Thanks >=20 > --=20 > Nikos R. Katsipoulakis,=20 > Department of Computer Science=20 > University of Pittsburgh --SKmjn7MmVx1ebXLdEHBSvgtq3PMUFbMvk-- --E4G6UUuOtomXpb8kNlRnqOsJrtdduAEg2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXWpN5AAoJEFCVK48prEZ4VOAQANidutHOMgrFzrBknu889mPI +Z2wlRXjvESNRw1oTks2QRE/pi0pWcJBy8fcyINT12NPn2P/6DwcEqCxsoBDgM21 p+vN8bVv93hLOKWIEC6Inz01M2R7G/YlnXWXDJnS8ndRnbMJQgLI+/XDqSxGVNYA HCxosOszSVa0+YWlFLqBjjjH6Gk3t0EIsPFXdQinCLR4+wUkcQVGnkF6t4ulpWt+ bebOGLwyB43dfq/NAAsHkDZYglB9pEl9iYCa8kt0SGC4wRUEOpJU/Ppxev3UE7gB aiaulVLMX34eg3DU8Sa6jO3GK052xpuyvpyjAItb6NT8GpyKxgqNpcUijfyk/iKJ ixHPaktq5Ydt4BKCX03gnurnKPxrZVQo2IOh5yw0ntdLsY0OAuHqgozORSbmanwg mqh6ofXqZ7CQscfmPOcYObiflXY/mON7Y4eXyRKyvdZc+bFBIBDP/jUjlOlhDgB8 VjqZ4T959pFvXTrekB/zr8kORpRt4JIKELX6IzDZOSZAqhXDrnSf5nlOkJR1ak36 pg2Bi9+GbZGKmqsi4+GSOLrZG+WuzZWkIT8pUKvXVM+Ht+GfOjZPZiaYSSBDTg8H GZBfivnk+vnm2ofXKiAJyB96lZpjfbhVlfec8At0o+RZVEEj3dwhjCcBw7c7dIpt AreooAipdra9D8neg64X =mE1l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E4G6UUuOtomXpb8kNlRnqOsJrtdduAEg2--