flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Way to hold execution of one of the map operator in Co-FlatMaps
Date Tue, 28 Jun 2016 09:00:54 GMT
Hi,
I might lead to flooding, yes. But I'm afraid it's the only way to go right
now.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 at 17:57 Biplob Biswas <revolutionisme@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I was afraid of buffering because I am not sure when the second map
> function
> would get data, wouldn't the first map be flooded with data while the
> second
> map gets data?
>
> Is it viable because the first stream is a stream of continuous data and
> the
> second stream gets data after some time and not as fast as the first one.
>
> Thanks for replying though, will try that out.
>
> Regards
> Biplob Biswas
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Way-to-hold-execution-of-one-of-the-map-operator-in-Co-FlatMaps-tp7689p7699.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
View raw message