flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Matthias J. Sax" <mj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Join two streams using a count-based window
Date Fri, 10 Jun 2016 10:16:15 GMT
I just put an answer to SO.

About the other questions: Flink processes tuple-by-tuple and does some
internal buffering. You might be interested in


On 06/09/2016 08:13 PM, Nikos R. Katsipoulakis wrote:
> Hello all,
> At first, I have a question posted on
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/37732978/join-two-streams-using-a-count-based-window
> . I am re-posting this on the mailing list in case some of you are not
> on SO.
> In addition, I would like to know what is the difference between Flink
> and other Streaming engines on data-granularity transport and
> processing. To be more precise, I am aware that Storm sends tuples using
> Netty (by filling up queues) and a Bolt's logic is executed per tuple.
> Spark, employs micro-batches to simulate streaming and (I am not
> entirely certain) each task performs processing on a micro-batch. What
> about Flink? How are tuples transferred and processed. Any explanation
> and or article/blog-post/link is more than welcome.
> Thanks
> -- 
> Nikos R. Katsipoulakis, 
> Department of Computer Science 
> University of Pittsburgh

View raw message