Ok..great to hear that!

Thanks to all for the support

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Ufuk Celebi <uce@apache.org> wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Aljoscha Krettek <aljoscha@apache.org> wrote:
> I think it might just be a warning. When using Kryo it is in the end a
> GenericTypeInformation but the TypeAnalyzer might still initially try to
> analyze it as a POJO.

Yes, that's correct.

To get back at the initial question: it's safe to ignore it then. ;)