Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 077E1194AF for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:03:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68370 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2016 15:03:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-user-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 68261 invoked by uid 500); 13 Apr 2016 15:03:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 68250 invoked by uid 99); 13 Apr 2016 15:03:13 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:03:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 07CB91A1087 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:03:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id V6tJ_lTHAGED for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:03:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f52.google.com (mail-oi0-f52.google.com [209.85.218.52]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C5E965FAED for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:03:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f52.google.com with SMTP id w85so67015487oiw.0 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=4kc4qtyM6Vd8xk1cauEVtOjrK8mSg9jOphApWlzdCT0=; b=L963PxFLq4yJ5luhXznguPH1PgicwsF0EU921GXo/J+Ga76c1BLFIKuqGEm53dgqND cSksn0IpuVEYL2uQ2JqKuw/a/SCblSjk8b01AyT7JKdHwHUIWHuEnLc74+MVCgIWyxmc //QTEvWpgFA4ZzRmTpQUQ4EsyfSlyD5Tg5CVLvq5+WJqM3R624bX6GZZtax3V0pI+JRv qMSelS/PYgiDxZtgitGt36OeZpN99wQQi9vvfxUubbKHgtOLOAwOP6z10Y60sGmfU2UB ou0ZKe9hVec6mJ+a5kvUWR38PhU9XfcSH+FqOi61U7oQO4czxDzDX5hqJsML6A2nV2Mh AGjg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=4kc4qtyM6Vd8xk1cauEVtOjrK8mSg9jOphApWlzdCT0=; b=DXlcOu2aUO8ffsGzzX08A9wAAuz0J5HF1rgl9qsYMKTkdSZdSFDzUtKFibhOneMnkF CADi6yU/w3Ktw2X2jnvJJygKdYd/gacNypTlU7oGzJTKl9o6dnY+AUC9Y4OINeo8BIPA 7Sx/1rFLFnJYz88Q1rtNaW/qewRkX/TEffSEPdRV2W+zv3GKWY2Co7oe/qBPzV4WIGfb W9IAYZUQtfK4hSCq4RNRHu0DFQjPdwMHBcXYHP75DLSDZO8NX4tsDMgI6gVdN9t7JF9H VfToB/drOfDVYFvAl473ZjY9XXNG95Hc0Kti++/tw6p5AtIuxL/HInurzs6bNtmpQwp7 y/Qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUH7abFNOtUP6Tbq1s5lUPbaRi2ofKD266KkdEKmDgSN5NxSUlWNBgQmiRGiZOpVV1uQsvyns+MgxnRkw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.84.1 with SMTP id i1mr4553737oib.130.1460559788140; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.96.135 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Flink performance pre-packaged vs. self-compiled From: Robert Schmidtke To: user@flink.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113de35858738c05305f13a1 --001a113de35858738c05305f13a1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi everyone, I'm using Flink 0.10.2 for some benchmarks and had to add some small changes to Flink, which led me to compiling and running it myself. This is when I noticed a performance difference in the pre-packaged Flink version that I downloaded from the web ( http://archive.apache.org/dist/flink/flink-0.10.2/flink-0.10.2-bin-hadoop27.tgz) versus the form of the release-0.10 branch I built myself (mvn -Dhadoop.version=2.7.1 -Dscala-2.11 -DskipTests -Drat.skip=true clean install // mvn version 3.0.4). I ran some version of TeraSort (https://github.com/eastcirclek/terasort) and I noticed that the pre-packaged version of Flink performs 10-20% better than the one I built myself (the only tweaks I mead are in the CliFrontend after the Job has finished running, so I would rule out bad programming on my side). Has anyone come across this before? Or could you provide me with clearer build instructions in order to reproduce the downloadable archive as closely as possible? Thanks in advance! Robert -- My GPG Key ID: 336E2680 --001a113de35858738c05305f13a1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi everyone,

I'm using Flink 0.10.2= for some benchmarks and had to add some small changes to Flink, which led = me to compiling and running it myself. This is when I noticed a performance= difference in the pre-packaged Flink version that I downloaded from the we= b (http://archive.apache.org/dist/flink/flink-0.10.2/flink= -0.10.2-bin-hadoop27.tgz) versus the form of the release-0.10 branch I = built myself (mvn -Dhadoop.version=3D2.7.1 -Dscala-2.11 -DskipTests -Drat.s= kip=3Dtrue clean install // mvn version 3.0.4).

I = ran some version of TeraSort (https://github.com/eastcirclek/terasort) and I noticed that the = pre-packaged version of Flink performs 10-20% better than the one I built m= yself (the only tweaks I mead are in the CliFrontend after the Job has fini= shed running, so I would rule out bad programming on my side).
Has anyone come across this before? Or could you provide me wi= th clearer build instructions in order to reproduce the downloadable archiv= e as closely as possible? Thanks in advance!

Rober= t

--
My GPG Key ID: 336E2680
--001a113de35858738c05305f13a1--