flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Robert Schmidtke <ro.schmid...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Flink performance pre-packaged vs. self-compiled
Date Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:13:11 GMT
Hi Robert,

thanks for the hint! Looks like something I could have figured out myself
-.-" I'll let you know if I find something.

Robert

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Robert,
>
> check out the tools/create_release_files.sh file in the source tree. There
> you can see how we are building the release binaries.
> It would be quite interesting to find out what caused the performance
> difference.
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Robert Schmidtke <ro.schmidtke@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm using Flink 0.10.2 for some benchmarks and had to add some small
>> changes to Flink, which led me to compiling and running it myself. This is
>> when I noticed a performance difference in the pre-packaged Flink version
>> that I downloaded from the web (
>> http://archive.apache.org/dist/flink/flink-0.10.2/flink-0.10.2-bin-hadoop27.tgz)
>> versus the form of the release-0.10 branch I built myself (mvn
>> -Dhadoop.version=2.7.1 -Dscala-2.11 -DskipTests -Drat.skip=true clean
>> install // mvn version 3.0.4).
>>
>> I ran some version of TeraSort (https://github.com/eastcirclek/terasort)
>> and I noticed that the pre-packaged version of Flink performs 10-20% better
>> than the one I built myself (the only tweaks I mead are in the CliFrontend
>> after the Job has finished running, so I would rule out bad programming on
>> my side).
>>
>> Has anyone come across this before? Or could you provide me with clearer
>> build instructions in order to reproduce the downloadable archive as
>> closely as possible? Thanks in advance!
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> --
>> My GPG Key ID: 336E2680
>>
>
>


-- 
My GPG Key ID: 336E2680

Mime
View raw message