flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Flavio Pompermaier <pomperma...@okkam.it>
Subject Re: DataSetUtils zipWithIndex question
Date Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:11:01 GMT
Hi Till and Tarandeep,
I'm also interested in better understanding my knowledge about the concept
of a partition..
>From what I know a partition is the portion of data assigned by the job
manager to each task manager..right?
Then, each partition is divided again at the task manager to maximize the
slot usage..is it correct?
In every case, there will be a case where at least one partition is smaller
than the others...am I wrong? Am I confusing some term..?

Best,
Flavio


On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 1:56 PM, Till Rohrmann <trohrmann@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Tarandeep,
>
> the number of elements in each partition should stay constant. In fact the
> elements in each partition should not change.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Tarandeep Singh <tarandeep@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am looking at implementation of zipWithIndex in DataSetUtils-
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/flink/blob/master/flink-java/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/api/java/utils/DataSetUtils.java
>>
>> It works in two phases/steps
>> 1) Count number of elements in each partition (using mapPartition)
>> 2) In second mapPartition, unique ID is assigned by calculating offset
>> using number of elements computed in step 1.
>>
>> Is there any chance the second mapPartition won't get same number of
>> elements as first mapPartition (assuming data is in HDFS)?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Tarandeep
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message