Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-flink-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-flink-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A06AA18DC6 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79018 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2016 16:05:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-flink-user-archive@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 78937 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2016 16:05:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 78927 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2016 16:05:13 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:13 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id A3318C0CB2 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.982 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.982 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EVCZxObRDn9m for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com (mail-wm0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 03034205F5 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 16:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f48.google.com with SMTP id f206so26196312wmf.0 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:05:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=8PFNRz8Oq35n7olQMJnOLdLRWKX/sb54oPe38yYFD9k=; b=jjLfzN19fbvkCQvkgtxT+GQLV6zcQFBsKc74vDYBN6zB9VFq0U5/jdNMEVvSxqeVfz StgYG/QQ79DNzFkWs15Y6crGsx0Wi/SaPNe2VnZSEtNOgp/jM/kjEomImoirZASfkaZ4 YupKnrdlYP8vzzy76L1AoFdyvKSQayV3PGnNyU6CgvYClFga3RffxfvW7dlGGIcmW93w lbbxu53E3SQTXzwJDKse0VR0mm+PjLHe0YSD8eWSAaG7qyFXs1ClKiyS7MB3pPynODOj 8JYT4mzSf1UWFE9wu6EXqg1/xSyVZcyNJ1sBg8L7P5+vg8Fl+AaNi453P5Fd89WU0dyT 7/bg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOQB0a6aL8bQfu96op6iVNWBWXarin8mIWdfzIDbm7eufJ6vdR+ZCBxFcoBwnaQTisMo X-Received: by 10.194.6.165 with SMTP id c5mr466482wja.88.1452873900990; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.20.10.3] (tmo-096-59.customers.d1-online.com. [80.187.96.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s129sm3112872wmf.18.2016.01.15.08.04.56 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 08:05:00 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Specify jobmanager port in HA mode From: Ufuk Celebi In-Reply-To: <7234CE04-07E0-48F0-AD6D-A6EFCC50BBB8@apache.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:04:45 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <652C5B6E-EF6F-4B11-8DA3-214DD1B1388C@apache.org> <2DD1FE53-F96D-4ECC-8655-C7BA0EC4FEB4@apache.org> <7555DD82-BEED-4563-919A-C06D7A8B43AC@apache.org> <7234CE04-07E0-48F0-AD6D-A6EFCC50BBB8@apache.org> To: user@flink.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) This is now part of the master branch and should be part of the SNAPSHOT = builds soon. The HA docs have a short paragraph on how to configure it. =E2=80=93 Ufuk > On 21 Dec 2015, at 12:10, Ufuk Celebi wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On 17 Dec 2015, at 19:36, Cory Monty = wrote: >>=20 >> Hey Ufuk, >>=20 >> We can try building it, but it might be a week or so given the = holidays. We're currently targeting development against 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT = and that release is OK unless 1.0 release is more than 2-3 months away. >=20 > OK, that=E2=80=99s the expected timeframe for the 1.0.0 release. >=20 >> Let me know if you still want us to build your PR and test it out. >=20 > The change should be in after the Holidays, so it should be OK to wait = if you don=E2=80=99t need it now. >=20 > =E2=80=93 Ufuk