flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fabian Hueske <fhue...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Flink Execution Plan
Date Thu, 14 Jan 2016 17:15:16 GMT
@Christian: I don't think that is possible.

There are quite a few things missing in the JSON including:
- User function objects (Flink ships objects not class names)
- Function configuration objects
- Data types

Best, Fabian

2016-01-14 16:02 GMT+01:00 lofifnc <alexander.kolb@mni.thm.de>:

> Hi Márton,
> Thanks for your answer. But now I'm even more confused as it somehow
> conflicts with the documentation. ;)
> According to the wiki and the stratosphere paper the JobGraph will be
> submitted to the JobManager. And the JobManager will then translate it into
> the ExecutionGraph.
> > In order to track the status of the parallel vertex and channel
> > instances individually, the Job Manager spans the Job Graph
> > to the Execution Graph, as shown in Fig. 9. The Execution
> > Graph contains a node for each parallel instance of a vertex,
> > which we refer to as a task.
> So the ExecutionGraph should only be available at the JobManager and
> contain
> a node for each parallel instance of a operator and the corresponding
> vertices.
> The question is in the context of my master thesis as I'm trying to
> describe
> the deployment process of Flink. And wan't to use a visualization of the
> execution plan as an concrete example for one of these three Graphs.
> Best Alex!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flink-user-mailing-list-archive.2336050.n4.nabble.com/Flink-Execution-Plan-tp4290p4297.html
> Sent from the Apache Flink User Mailing List archive. mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.

View raw message