flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nirmalya Sengupta <sengupta.nirma...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Continuing from the stackoverflow post
Date Wed, 02 Dec 2015 02:26:10 GMT
Hello Fabian (<fhueske@gmail.com>),

Many thanks for your encouraging words about the blogs. I want to make a
sincere attempt.

To summarise my understanding of the rule of removal of the elements from
the window (after going through your last mail), here are two corollaries:

1) If my workflow has no triggers (and hence, no evictors), my application
will run out of memory, perhaps sooner than I expect.

2) If I am using CountTriggers only (and no Evictors), then I too my
application will run out of memory, eventually.

Could you please strike them with Yes/No?

I understand why removal of elements from the window is essential. In fact
if older elements are not removed, new elements cannot come in and
therefore, the conceptual proposition of a **flowing Stream** is not
realized in the right manner.


-- Nirmalya


-- 
Software Technologist
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nirmalyasengupta
"If you have built castles in the air, your work need not be lost. That is
where they should be.
Now put the foundation under them."

Mime
View raw message