flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Operators chaining as custom functions
Date Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:21:38 GMT
Hi Flavio!

In Scala:

You can do that, using the "pimp my library" pattern. Define your own data
set (MyDataSet) that has the method "myFunction()" and define an implicit
conversion from DataSet to MyData set. See here for more details:

In Java

1) You need to define a class MyUtils, there

public class MyUtils {
    public static DataSet[MyType] myFunction(DataSet[String] input) {
        return input.map(...).reduce(...);

2) You can define a custom unary operation:

It allows you to write code like  "DataSet<MyType> result =
data.runOperation(new MyFunction());

public class MyFunction implements CustomUnaryOperation<String, MyType> {
    private DataSet<String> input;

    public void setInput(DataSet<String> input) {
        this.input = input

    public DataSet<MyType> createResult() {
        return input.map(...).reduce(...);



On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Flavio Pompermaier <pompermaier@okkam.it>

> Hi guys,
> I'd like to know whether it is possible or not save a chain of operators
> as a custom function.
> For example, If I have a DataSet transformation composed by a map followed
> by a reduce (but this is a simple case, I could have a more complex
> scenario), is it possible to save it as a custom function (eg. "myFunction"
> => map.reduce) so that I can call mydataset.myFunction() instead of
> myDataset.map().reduce()?
> Best,
> Flavio

View raw message