flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org>
Subject Re: VertexUpdateFunction class has memory between the supersteps
Date Wed, 15 Oct 2014 23:34:43 GMT
Hi!

I am not sure that I understand the question. What memory between
supersteps are you referring to?

If you mean that the same instances of the functions are used across all
supersteps and that their variables are kept: yes, you can rely on that.

Stephan
 Am 15.10.2014 17:09 schrieb "Attila BernĂ¡th" <bernath.athos@gmail.com>:

> Dear All,
>
> I am using the spargel API. I found that the VertexUpdateFunction
> class has memory between the supersteps. Is it safe to rely on this
> memory?
>
> Attila
>

Mime
View raw message