flink-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Attila BernĂ¡th <bernath.at...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: VertexUpdateFunction class has memory between the supersteps
Date Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:23:06 GMT
For example: an instance of the vertexupdatefunction processes certain
vertices in one superstep (in its updateVertex method). Can I assume
that it will process the same vertices in the next superstep, too?


2014-10-16 1:34 GMT+02:00 Stephan Ewen <sewen@apache.org>:
> Hi!
> I am not sure that I understand the question. What memory between supersteps
> are you referring to?
> If you mean that the same instances of the functions are used across all
> supersteps and that their variables are kept: yes, you can rely on that.
> Stephan
> Am 15.10.2014 17:09 schrieb "Attila BernĂ¡th" <bernath.athos@gmail.com>:
>> Dear All,
>> I am using the spargel API. I found that the VertexUpdateFunction
>> class has memory between the supersteps. Is it safe to rely on this
>> memory?
>> Attila

View raw message