From issues-return-369630-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@flink.apache.org Mon Jun 1 06:31:00 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [207.244.88.153]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id ECF261804BB for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2020 08:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 53630 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jun 2020 06:30:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 53621 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jun 2020 06:30:59 -0000 Received: from ec2-52-202-80-70.compute-1.amazonaws.com (HELO gitbox.apache.org) (52.202.80.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 01 Jun 2020 06:30:59 +0000 From: =?utf-8?q?GitBox?= To: issues@flink.apache.org Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BGitHub=5D_=5Bflink=5D_flinkbot_commented_on_pull_request_=23124?= =?utf-8?q?22=3A_=5BFLINK-17901=5D=5Bpython=5D_Add_module_interface_in_PyFli?= =?utf-8?q?nk?= Message-ID: <159099305911.10999.12045846650237301676.asfpy@gitbox.apache.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 06:30:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: References: flinkbot commented on pull request #12422: URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/12422#issuecomment-636639198 Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review. ## Automated Checks Last check on commit 59afc249064561ff596c39c12dee3c7c8578dd07 (Mon Jun 01 06:30:47 UTC 2020) **Warnings:** * No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date! Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks. ## Review Progress * ❓ 1. The [description] looks good. * ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink. * ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from. * ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture]. * ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good. Please see the [Pull Request Review Guide](https://flink.apache.org/contributing/reviewing-prs.html) for a full explanation of the review process.
The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands: - `@flinkbot approve description` to approve one or more aspects (aspects: `description`, `consensus`, `architecture` and `quality`) - `@flinkbot approve all` to approve all aspects - `@flinkbot approve-until architecture` to approve everything until `architecture` - `@flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..]` to require somebody's attention - `@flinkbot disapprove architecture` to remove an approval you gave earlier
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: users@infra.apache.org