From issues-return-172389-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@flink.apache.org Wed Jun 20 09:01:04 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 778CC180648 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 09:01:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 1128 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jun 2018 07:01:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 1118 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jun 2018 07:01:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 23E45C754D for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -110.301 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.301 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AmcDf-T43Ism for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4EE165F57E for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C10D3E0D3C for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2A98A21841 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 07:01:00 +0000 (UTC) From: "aitozi (JIRA)" To: issues@flink.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Created] (FLINK-9620) Add an alternative option to choose when deal with eventtime cep MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 aitozi created FLINK-9620: ----------------------------- Summary: Add an alternative option to choose when deal with ev= enttime cep Key: FLINK-9620 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9620 Project: Flink Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: aitozi Assignee: aitozi Now when deal with eventtime, it use the elementQueue to buffer event to wo= rk with the out of order data, I think its ok. But when the key is very=C2= =A0 fragmented, every time the watermark advanced , all key's timer have to= been evaluted. What about add an alternative option that indicates the str= eam has been ordered updtream, which will simply the logic when deal with c= ep eventtime, the work of ordering a stream by time can be done upstream by= userself by the window or other way.=C2=A0 What's your guys idea=C2=A0[~dawidwys] [~kkl0u] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)