flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "swy (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-9506) Flink ReducingState.add causing more than 100% performance drop
Date Sun, 03 Jun 2018 15:03:00 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16499445#comment-16499445
] 

swy commented on FLINK-9506:
----------------------------

what we want to know is: Is this something expected or something wrong in our code?

> Flink ReducingState.add causing more than 100% performance drop
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-9506
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-9506
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.2
>            Reporter: swy
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: flink.png
>
>
> Hi, we found out application performance drop more than 100% when ReducingState.add is
used in the source code. In the test checkpoint is disable. And filesystem(hdfs) as statebackend.
> It could be easyly reproduce with a simple app, without checkpoint, just simply keep
storing record, also with simple reduction function(in fact with empty function would see
the same result). Any idea would be appreciated. What an unbelievable obvious issue.
> Basically the app just keep storing record into the state, and we measure how many record
per second in "JsonTranslator", which is shown in the graph. The difference between is just
1 line, comment/un-comment "recStore.add(r)".
> {code}
> DataStream<String> stream = env.addSource(new GeneratorSource(loop);
> DataStream<JSONObject> convert = stream.map(new JsonTranslator())
>                                        .keyBy()
>                                        .process(new ProcessAggregation())
>                                        .map(new PassthruFunction());  
> public class ProcessAggregation extends ProcessFunction {
>     private ReducingState<Record> recStore;
>     public void processElement(Recordr, Context ctx, Collector<Record> out) {
>         recStore.add(r); //this line make the difference
> }
> {code}
> Record is POJO class contain 50 String private member.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Mime
View raw message