Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF3C200D2F for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:46:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 0B5E2160BFA; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 51F77160BE6 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 12:46:02 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 82495 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2017 11:46:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 82485 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2017 11:46:01 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:46:01 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CAA791807F7 for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.021 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C86e4F5XsyYE for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with SMTP id DA2705FDAB for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82441 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2017 11:45:59 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:45:59 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 59BB0DFB6F; Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:45:59 +0000 (UTC) From: XuPingyong To: issues@flink.incubator.apache.org Reply-To: issues@flink.incubator.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] flink issue #2110: [FLINK-3974] Fix object reuse with multi-chaining Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20171101114559.59BB0DFB6F@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 11:45:59 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 11:46:03 -0000 Github user XuPingyong commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2110 I do not agree with this pr as it always copy StreamRecord to downstream operator. StreamMap change the input StreamRecord, so this pr works well. But many operators do not change/reuse the input StreamRecord, like StreamFlatMap. The following code no not need the extra copy. `DataStream input = ... input .flatmap(FlatMapFunction...) .addSink(...); input .flatmap(FlatMapFunction...) ​.addSink(...);` So I think we can change StreamMap to not reuse the input StreamRecord. And directly send the StreamRecord if objectReuse is set true. What do you think? ---