flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-7194) Add getResultType and getAccumulatorType to AggregateFunction
Date Fri, 21 Jul 2017 14:35:01 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7194?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16096322#comment-16096322

ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-7194:

Github user sunjincheng121 commented on the issue:

    Hi @fhueske  Thanks for the update. The PR. looks good to me. -:)
    + to merge.

> Add getResultType and getAccumulatorType to AggregateFunction
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: FLINK-7194
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-7194
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Table API & SQL
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Fabian Hueske
>            Assignee: Fabian Hueske
> FLINK-6725 and FLINK-6457 proposed to remove methods with default implementations such
as {{getResultType()}}, {{toString()}}, or {{requiresOver()}} from the base classes of user-defined
methods (UDF, UDTF, UDAGG) and instead offer them as contract methods which are dynamically

> In PR [#3993|https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3993] I argued that these methods have
a fixed signature (in contrast to the {{eval()}}, {{accumulate()}} and {{retract()}} methods)
and should be kept in the classes. For users that don't need these methods, this doesn't make
a difference because the methods are not abstract and have a default implementation. For users
that need to override the methods it makes a difference, because they get IDE and compiler
support when overriding them and the cannot get the signature wrong.
> Consequently, I propose to add {{getResultType()}} and {{getAccumulatorType()}} as methods
with default implementation to {{AggregateFunction}}. This will make the interface of {{AggregateFunction}}
more consistent with {{ScalarFunction}} and {{TableFunction}}.
> What do you think [~shaoxuan], [~RuidongLi] and [~jark]?

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

View raw message