flink-issues mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From zentol <...@git.apache.org>
Subject [GitHub] flink pull request #4136: [FLINK-6940][docs] Clarify the effect of configuri...
Date Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:03:20 GMT
Github user zentol commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/4136#discussion_r123228173
  
    --- Diff: docs/ops/state_backends.md ---
    @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ RocksDBStateBackend is currently the only backend that offers incremental
checkp
     ## Configuring a State Backend
     
     State backends can be configured per job. In addition, you can define a default state
backend to be used when the
    -job does not explicitly define a state backend.
    +job does not explicitly define a state backend. Besides, state backend configured per-job
will overwrite the default state backend configured in `flink-conf.yaml`
    --- End diff --
    
    Would it be enough to reword the existing docs to:
    
    "
    State backends can be configured per job. In addition, you can define a default state
backend **in `flink-conf.yaml`** to be used when the job does not explicitly define a state
backend.
    "


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

Mime
View raw message