Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC757200C59 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DB2D0160B9C; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 3119C160BAE for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 11:04:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 60633 invoked by uid 500); 17 Apr 2017 09:04:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 60624 invoked by uid 99); 17 Apr 2017 09:04:44 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:44 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 080E818030D for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.002 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.002 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B0n3uFqmwOT6 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org [209.188.14.139]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id B79165FBBB for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (unknown [207.244.88.139]) by mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mailrelay1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 2FD0EE06BE for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jira-lw-us.apache.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jira-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at jira-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTP id 973C621B47 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" To: issues@flink.apache.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [jira] [Commented] (FLINK-6257) Post-pass OVER windows MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-JIRA-FingerPrint: 30527f35849b9dde25b450d4833f0394 archived-at: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 09:04:46 -0000 [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15970882#comment-15970882 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-6257: --------------------------------------- Github user sunjincheng121 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3697 @zentol Thank you for the reminder. And I added some change messages. Thanks, SunJincheng > Post-pass OVER windows > ---------------------- > > Key: FLINK-6257 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6257 > Project: Flink > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Table API & SQL > Affects Versions: 1.3.0 > Reporter: Fabian Hueske > Assignee: sunjincheng > Priority: Critical > > The OVER windows have been implemented by several contributors. > We should do a post pass over the contributed code and improve a few things. > * Functionality > ** Currently every time attribute is allowed as ORDER BY attribute. We must check that this is actually a time indicator ({{procTime()}}, {{rowTime()}}) and that the order is ASCENDING. > * Documentation > ** Add documentation for OVER windows > * Code style > ** Consistent naming of {{ProcessFunctions}} and methods > * Tests > ** Move the OVER window tests out of SqlITCase into a dedicated class > ** Move the OVER window tests out of WindowAggregateTest into a dedicated class > ** Add tests based on the test harness for all {{ProcessFunctions}} similar to {{BoundedProcessingOverRangeProcessFunction}}. The tests should include exact boundary checks for range windows and check for proper parallelization with multiple keys. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)