Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9224C200C62 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:49:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 90A4F160BA8; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D67E4160B95 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 16:49:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 8498 invoked by uid 500); 26 Apr 2017 14:49:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact issues-help@flink.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@flink.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list issues@flink.apache.org Received: (qmail 8489 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2017 14:49:51 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:49:51 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7BE01D5135 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.021 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.021 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8EVBvLz5_Jf for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with SMTP id 901D7632A4 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:41:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81373 invoked by uid 99); 26 Apr 2017 14:41:28 -0000 Received: from git1-us-west.apache.org (HELO git1-us-west.apache.org) (140.211.11.23) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:41:28 +0000 Received: by git1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at git1-us-west.apache.org, from userid 33) id 9EC40E1103; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:41:28 +0000 (UTC) From: huawei-flink To: issues@flink.incubator.apache.org Reply-To: issues@flink.incubator.apache.org References: In-Reply-To: Subject: [GitHub] flink issue #3771: [FLINK-6250] Distinct procTime with Rows boundaries Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <20170426144128.9EC40E1103@git1-us-west.apache.org> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:41:28 +0000 (UTC) archived-at: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:49:53 -0000 Github user huawei-flink commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3771 @fhueske @haohui I have no problem removing the DIST() part, it is just not possible to test it without. Shall I push just the code generation and aggregates util changes? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---